The fact is that Norwegian women are not, and 85-year-old women with aluminum walkers are not, the source of the terrorist threat. No one approves of racial profiling, that is not the issue. That was it, Lehman said, "because of this political correctness that became so entrenched in the 1990s, and continues in current administration. So if airline security had three suspicious Arab guys they had had to let one go because they'd reached a quota? "They said under oath that indeed the Department of Transportation continued to fine any airline that was caught having more than two people of the same ethnic persuasion in a secondary line for line for questioning, including and especially, two Arabs." "We had testimony a couple of months ago from the past president of United, and current president of American Airlines that kind of shocked us all," Lehman told me. But while Ben-Veniste and Kerrey played to the cameras, it was their colleague, John Lehman, who was breaking new ground with the national-security adviser, but few noticed.Īmong Lehman's questions was this: "Were you aware that it was the policy.to fine airlines if they have more than two young Arab males in secondary questioning because that's discriminatory?" Richard Ben-Veniste and Bob Kerrey received the lion's share of media attention paid to last week's 9/11 Commission hearing with Condoleezza Rice, thanks to their generally intemperate questioning style. And we won't allow you to practice the, err, politics of personal destruction under the guise of defending yourself from self-alleged "attacks on your patriotism."īy the way, we think Kim Il Jung has the best voice out of John Kerry's foreign endorsers. Your record, like the record of every other candidate who's ever run for office, is fair game. He claims that any discussion whatsoever of his record in public office constitutes an "attack on his patriotism" - most disinterested parties would call it an "attack on his record" - and, therefore, he infers the right to attack his opponents in the very terms he so shrilly decries, i.e., as unpatriotic. Basically, John Kerry is now fighting any mention of his weak-on-defense record - a perfectly legitimate topic for discussion - by impugning the patriotism of his opponents. Our motto remains: You can't fight the funny. It would make for a good couple of days of strategizing by teams and chatter by fans, at the very least.įoreign Leaders Sing the Praises of John Kerry.Ĭheap? Irresponsible? Pathologically partisan?Įh. Since there are now ninety-six NBA teams that qualify for the playoffs - in the NBA's innovative system, not only do all actual NBA teams automatically make the playoffs, but so do a passel of Italian-league semi-pro clubs, along with the occasional junior high soccer squad - there's obviously a lot of choice to be had. Benjamin's talking about the NBA, where this system makes a lot of sense, given the enormous size of the post-season tournament field. So Stuart Benjamin at the Volokh Conspiracy asks: Why not give the top team in a tournament its choice of opponent? So it often happens that the top seed will be forced to play a team with a mediocre record but which is in fact quite strong (either because it's surging, or because it's just a good match-up against that particular top seed), while a lesser seed will face a patsy with a better, but deceivingly so, record. The idea is to reward the team with the best record with the most inferior opponent.īut the actual system is a poor implementation of that intent- because records often don't accurately reflect a team's actual strength. You know how post-season tournaments usually work: the top seed plays the bottom seed in a bracket, the second-best seed plays the second-worst, etc. FloridaCracker (New Address!!! New Design!!!)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |